Fearless Bit

I was too cramped on space on the 64 gig X25-E that I’ve been (very happily) running for 1 1/2 years now on my Lenovo W500 with Windows 7. I dropped $429 for the 160 gig X25-M a couple of weeks ago and I must say, I’m really impressed. I was nervous that it would be slower than the X25-e. Quite the opposite — it’s in fact faster (I’m guessing due to being so full & thus fragmented on the X25-E). I boot to login prompt in 20 seconds instead of 30. Even crazy write operations (such as the copying 40,000 files that make up my local SVN working copy) is a little faster.
I’ve experienced no stuttering — no problems of any kind. If you were hesitating, don’t. I’m very happy with the purchase!

I saw these bulbs at Home Depot the other day for $20 and decided to try one.  I’d read that this style of LED lighting didn’t suffer from the directional issues the ones I’m currently using do.  I used a 100 watt incandescent (I was too lazy to go find a 40 watt), a 14 watt CFL, and this 8.6 watt LED.  I’ll let the pictures do the talking.  Videos coming soon.  One other big note — there’s NO DELAY in turning this LED light on like my others.  Instant-on and instant-full-power.  Awesome!

Some great jargon over at http://www.globalnerdy.com/2010/05/09/new-programming-jargon/. My favorite is “Yoda Conditions” — things like “if (5 == count)”

This post not only covers some good guidelines, but why they’re important.

I thought this video was worth watching.  Nice compare-n-contrast between the way things were done before Agile, during Agile in established business, and Agile for a startup.  One thing that stuck with me is the story about a situation where the question was “will people buy the for-pay portion of this product?”  Answering that might drag people into the “oh man, we need to build a payment gateway, etc. etc.” … well, why not just build a “buy button” where it opens the second half of the product and lets the product owners know that someone pressed the button — even though that makes it free for those people.  So what?  You’ll learn whether people will pay for it.

Some not-so-good news for the SSD drive I was keeping my eye on: http://www.anandtech.com/storage/showdoc.aspx?i=3779. Their drive died after some use and there’s some very serious performance problems after enough data has been written to the device.  Here’s hoping Crucial fixes the problem and AnandTech testing that all is well…

So I installed VS2010 RC and am reading some books… and came across a demo of the new “dynamic” type in C# 4.0 that I thought I’d share …

The Basics

[TestMethod()]
public void BasicDynamicTest()
{
    dynamic f = Activator.CreateInstance(Type.GetType("System.Text.StringBuilder"));
    f.Append("Hello");
    f.Append(" World!");
    Assert.AreEqual("Hello World!", f.ToString());
}

The type of f is is determined at runtime.  You might be wondering why you’d want to do something like the above.  You might start thinking about evaluating expressions at runtime, a la scripting or dynamic languages like Python or Ruby.  How about something even more clever, like defining the structure of an object at runtime?

DynamicObject

To do so, you need to create a class that inherits from the DynamicObject class and then you can do things like override the TryGetMember method so you can create your own methods on the class at runtime:

// First, make sure MyXML inherits from DynamicObject
class MyXML : DynamicObject
{
	private XDocument _xml = new XDocument();

	// Simple constructor
	public MyXML(string x)
	{
		this._xml = XDocument.Parse(x);
	}

	// Let's dynamically create our own methods
	public override bool TryGetMember(GetMemberBinder binder, out object result)
	{
		string nodeName = binder.Name;
		result = _xml.Element("top").Element(nodeName).Value;
		return true;
	}
}

[TestMethod()]
public void MyXMLConstructorTest()
{
	dynamic xml = new MyXML(@"
		<top>
			<node1>Alpha</node1>
			<node2>Beta</node2>
		</top>");
	Assert.AreEqual("Alpha", xml.node1);
	Assert.AreEqual("Beta", xml.node2);
}

Drawbacks?

While you can basically do this with Reflection, dynamic code is much easier to deal with. You lose Intellisense on dynamic types, compile-time checking, and performance. The DLR (Dynamic Language Runtime) does the runtime interpreting for you. As the author of the book that I’m reading states, you generally wouldn’t want to use dynamic code except where you’d otherwise be using reflection; C# by nature is statically-typed so most of the time, you’re better served by writing static code.

Incidentally, the C#/.NET 4.0 book I’m reading (1 of 3) is Introducing .NET 4.0 With Visual Studio 2010 by Alex Mackey. I haven’t gotten through enough of it to have a firm opinion but I picked it up because I liked the sharp and tight focus on things that are new in 4.0 as well as the focus on MVC 2 and jQuery (there looks to be some nice interop there).

I’m so tempted to buy one of these new ridiculously-fast SSDs and break out of the 64 gig limitation I currently have.

I found this to be an interesting list of things to think about using to improve how well you retain information or how quickly you learn.

I really like this post.  FTA:

I wouldn’t call ideas worthless, per se, but it’s clear that ideas alone are a hollow sort of currency. Success is rarely determined by the quality of your ideas. But it is frequently determined by the quality of your execution. So instead of worrying about whether the Next Big Idea you’re all working on is sufficiently brilliant, worry about how well you’re executing.

If you give a good idea to a mediocre group, they’ll screw it up. If you give a mediocre idea to a good group, they’ll fix it. Or they’ll throw it away and come up with something else.